Monday, October 04, 2004

Does Iran own Kerry like Red China owned Clinton?

Is Lurch on Tehran's payroll?

"Senator John Kerry's call for providing Iran with the nuclear fuel it seeks, even while the regime is believed to be only months away from developing nuclear weapons, is being linked to his campaign contributions from backers of the mullah government in Tehran.

"During last Thursday's nationally televised debate between the Democratic presidential candidate and President Bush, Kerry insisted as president he would provide Tehran with the nuclear fuel it wants for a pledge to use it for peaceful purposes only. ...

"Among Kerry's top fund-raisers are three Iranian-Americans who have been pushing for dramatic changes in U.S. policy toward the Islamic Republic of Iran.

"Most prominent among them is Hassan Nemazee, 54, an investment banker based in New York. ... Nemazee was a major Clinton donor, giving $80,000 to the Democratic National Committee during the 1996 election cycle and attending at least one of the famous White House fund-raising coffees.

"In 2001, at the invitation of Mobil Oil Chairman Lucio Noto, whom he counts as a 'personal friend,' Nemazee joined the board of the American-Iranian Council, a U.S. lobbying group that consistently has supported lifting U.S. sanctions on Iran and accommodating the Tehran regime."

Captain Ed has a ton more on Nemazee, including his use of a uniquely American tool of war - frivolous lawsuits - to destroy anti-mullah Iranian organizations such as the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran (SMCCDI), the veritable Islamist fifth column he coordinates in America, and how it has worked diligently throughout most of the Clinton years to penetrate the Democratic Party.

Given John Kerry's eagerness to supply Tehran with weapons-grade nuclear fuel on the "promise" that they'll use it only for "peaceful" purposes, it would seem that that penetration has reached its hilt and then some.

Good Lord, is there anybody in that party that isn't a conscienceless, hopelessly corrupt mercenary? And are we reaching the point where the continued existence of the Democratic Party in its current collective mindset is itself a threat to national security?