Hitler @ The League Of Nations
If the infamous Nazi dictator ever had given a keynote address, complete with trademark wild gesticulations and crazed, quasi-demonic raving, I tend to think that Iranian frontman Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's speech to the UN General Assembly last week was as close a fascimile as we'll ever get.
Substitute Adolph Jr.'s crazoid Shia apocalypticism for Adolph Sr.'s Teutonic racial supremacism and the parallel borders on the verbatim. Same ingrained dishonesty, bordering on delusion; same unshakeable confidence in his country's inevitable global conquest; and the same imprudent recklessness based upon that overconfidence and the galloping contempt the West has gone out of its way to cultivate in the mullahgarchy and its public spokesman.
Double-H called it "chilling":
In truth, that wouldn't be all that big a step from where the UN is already. Packing the Security Council or, conversely, stripping the United States of its veto power or expelling us altogether would simply formalize a reality that now has to flow through "unofficial" channels, greased by a never-diminishing flood of illicit corruption of which Oily Food was but the iceberg's tip. Unlike the League of Nations that preceded it, the UN wouldn't fall into irrelevancy; it would, rather, finally complete its transmogrification from bulwark of post-WWII international democracy and peace to twenty-first century Legion of Doom.
Not that Ahmadinejad will likely wait around long enough for that to happen on its own, as his closing Islamist benediction, translated by Powerline reader Michael Stalker, unambiguously indicates:
Yes, Adolph Jr. is, indeed, one seriously disturbed fruit loop. And no, he doesn't possess unstoppable conventional military capability, as his historical antecedent did. What he does possess, or shortly will, is something Hitler never did: nuclear weapons. Hitler didn't resort to terrorist tactics until after his war was already lost. For the mullahs, terrorism IS their war, the will of their enemy - us - not our military capability, their target. With nukes at their fingertips, they believe we would bow at their feet rather than resist them.
As if to confirm that, the Iranian "president" made his regime's sentiments promiscuously clear to the Council on Foreign Relations:
The mullahgarchy keeps giving us one Mein Kampf after another. If we refuse to pay heed until the screeding is punctuated by a flash and a roar, it'll be our own damn fault.
Substitute Adolph Jr.'s crazoid Shia apocalypticism for Adolph Sr.'s Teutonic racial supremacism and the parallel borders on the verbatim. Same ingrained dishonesty, bordering on delusion; same unshakeable confidence in his country's inevitable global conquest; and the same imprudent recklessness based upon that overconfidence and the galloping contempt the West has gone out of its way to cultivate in the mullahgarchy and its public spokesman.
Double-H called it "chilling":
He asserted that the US was behind the Hezbollah-Israel War, repeatedly attacked the legitimacy of the State of Israel, and made a lengthy attack on the legitimacy of the Security Council. "Is it appropriate to expect this generation to submit to[to the Security Council]?" he asked, and demanded the General Assembly take on the reform of the UN and equip others with the veto power.
In truth, that wouldn't be all that big a step from where the UN is already. Packing the Security Council or, conversely, stripping the United States of its veto power or expelling us altogether would simply formalize a reality that now has to flow through "unofficial" channels, greased by a never-diminishing flood of illicit corruption of which Oily Food was but the iceberg's tip. Unlike the League of Nations that preceded it, the UN wouldn't fall into irrelevancy; it would, rather, finally complete its transmogrification from bulwark of post-WWII international democracy and peace to twenty-first century Legion of Doom.
Not that Ahmadinejad will likely wait around long enough for that to happen on its own, as his closing Islamist benediction, translated by Powerline reader Michael Stalker, unambiguously indicates:
“IfCan you imagine the reaction of the Enemy Media if President Bush had closed his remarks with a prayerful invocation of the Great Commission? Yet Ahmadinejad's extollation of "evangelism by the sword" got not a peep of press attention. Probably because the objects of his hatred - Jews and Christians - are looked down upon by Western libs with contempt and disdain (at best) as well. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," as the old saying goes.wisdom, ethics and justiceIslam prevail[s], then oppression and aggression will be uprooted, threats will wither away, and no reason will remain for conflict. This is a solid proposition because most global conflicts emanate frominjusticeinfidels and from the powerful not being contented with their own rights striving to devour the rights of others. People across the globe embrace justice Islam and are willing to sacrifice for its sake. Would it not be easier for global powers to ensure their longevity and win hearts and minds through the championing of real promotion ofjustice, compassion and peaceIslam, than through continuing the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons and the threat of their use?”
***
“We can adopt firm and logical decisions, thereby improving the prospects of a better life for current and future generations. Together, we can eradicate the roots of bitter maladies and afflictions and instead, through the promotion ofuniversal and lasting values such as ethics, spirituality and justiceIslam, allow our nations to taste the sweetness of a better future.Peoples driven by their divine natureMuslims intrinsically seek good, virtue, perfection and beauty. Relying on ourpeoplesMuslims, we can take giant steps towards reform and pave the road for human perfection. Whether we like it or not,justice, peace and virtueIslam will sooner or later prevail in the world with the will of the Almighty God. It is imperative, and also desirable, that we, too, contribute to the promotion ofjustice and virtueIslam.”
***
“All divine prophets, from the Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) to the Prophet Moses, to the Prophet Jesus Christ, to the Prophet Mohammad have all called humanity tomonotheism, justice, brotherhood, love and compassionIslam. Is it not possible to build a better world based onmonotheism, justice, love and respect for the rights of human beingsIslam, and thereby transform animosities into friendship? I emphatically declare that today's world more than ever before longs forjust and righteous people with love for all humanityMuslims, and above all, longs for theperfect righteous human being and the real saviorHidden Imam who has been promised to all peoples and who will establishjustice, peace and brotherhoodIslam on he planet. Oh, Almighty God, all men and women are your creatures and you have ordained their guidance and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirsts forjusticeIslam, theperfect humanHidden Imam being promised to all by you, and make us among his followers and among those who strive for his return and his cause.”
Yes, Adolph Jr. is, indeed, one seriously disturbed fruit loop. And no, he doesn't possess unstoppable conventional military capability, as his historical antecedent did. What he does possess, or shortly will, is something Hitler never did: nuclear weapons. Hitler didn't resort to terrorist tactics until after his war was already lost. For the mullahs, terrorism IS their war, the will of their enemy - us - not our military capability, their target. With nukes at their fingertips, they believe we would bow at their feet rather than resist them.
As if to confirm that, the Iranian "president" made his regime's sentiments promiscuously clear to the Council on Foreign Relations:
On Wednesday Ahmadinejad met senior US government officials at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York; the top American officials present at the meeting, some of them members of the George Bush senior administration, left with the feeling that a confrontation with Iran is inevitable.He does, and we are - "whether we like it or not."
The meeting was held despite staunch opposition from US government officials and Jewish community leaders.
Among those present were former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft and former ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk.
Robert Blackwell, who served as head of the Iraq desk at the National Security Council under Condoleezza Rice, said following the meeting, “If this man represents Tehran’s position, we are heading toward a massive confrontation with Iran.” [emphasis added]
The mullahgarchy keeps giving us one Mein Kampf after another. If we refuse to pay heed until the screeding is punctuated by a flash and a roar, it'll be our own damn fault.
<<< Home