Another Clinton Conspiracy
Yeah, I know, "There goes Sondergoebbels again with the right-wing extremist paranoia. It was bogus ten years ago and it's even moreso today. Can't he ever 'move on?'"
Well, no, not really, because the Clintonoid left never "moved on". Even moreso the nutroots that succeeded them (temporarily, I assure you) as Democrat Party movers & shakers (literally), who could be shoved into cryogenic stasis for a thousand years, revived, learn about an asteroid strike in 2753, and would still hysterically blame the cataclysm on George W. Bush.
Besides, they're the ones that to this day still talk of "vast right-wing conspiracies." And the conspiracy to which I refer is real as roast beef (from FrontPage Magazine):
Parenthetically, this is why I roll my eyes whenever I read stories about the nutroots "booing" Hillary. They know deep down that she's one of them, and they'll back her candidacy next year, even if not all that enthusiastically. Why? Because deep down, they want to win. Putting up another Ned Lamont writ large isn't going to get them anywhere, and Mrs. Clinton will be a heckuva lot more palatable than Fred Thompson or Mitt Romney.
Anyway, why do I bring up C[r]AP? Because it was that self-same Clintonoid cabal that produced the big-splash "report," entitled The Right Wing Domination Of Talk Radio And How To End It, that, despite the evocative handle, is intended as a legitimate public policy proposal seeking to "restore objectivity and balance to the public airwaves". Translated from the original Clintonoid BS, it means "muzzle the center-right by shutting down the only sector of the media in which conservatives are allowed to compete, and in which we can't".
Mark Levin says it well:
And just in time for the 2008 presidential election, too.
Yeah, THAT's a coincidence.
At least as much as this was:
Whether that bipartisan threesome transpired "the other day" or three years ago, it provides additional, and redundant, context for the C[r]AP anti-talk radio report.
It is, indeed, another Clintonoid conspiracy, folks. But like all Clintonoid conspiracies, this one is taking place right out in the open, in plain sight, for any who have the courage and testicular fortitude to see it for what it is. And in fifteen years on the national stage, not once have Bill & Hill ever been called on a single one of them - at least none that didn't involve pecker tracks.
Hillary is America's answer to Hugo Chavez. One can only imagine the reign of terror that will commence after she's sworn in nineteen months from two days ago.
But at least the days of Clintonoid conspiracies will come to an end.
Well, no, not really, because the Clintonoid left never "moved on". Even moreso the nutroots that succeeded them (temporarily, I assure you) as Democrat Party movers & shakers (literally), who could be shoved into cryogenic stasis for a thousand years, revived, learn about an asteroid strike in 2753, and would still hysterically blame the cataclysm on George W. Bush.
Besides, they're the ones that to this day still talk of "vast right-wing conspiracies." And the conspiracy to which I refer is real as roast beef (from FrontPage Magazine):
The institutional manifestation of the Hillary-Soros axis is a group called the Center for American Progress, whose president John Podesta formerly served as chief of staff to the Clinton White House. Hillary has no official connection to the Center. However, her dominance of the organization seems to be something of an open secret among leftists. One insider told a UPI reporter that the Center is “the official Hillary Clinton think tank.” Robert Dreyfuss of The Nation wrote of the Center, “It’s not completely wrong to see it as a shadow government, a kind of Clinton White House-in-exile – or a White House staff in readiness for President Hillary Clinton.” The Center for American Progress received its start-up funding from Soros and was, in fact, Soros’ brainchild.
Parenthetically, this is why I roll my eyes whenever I read stories about the nutroots "booing" Hillary. They know deep down that she's one of them, and they'll back her candidacy next year, even if not all that enthusiastically. Why? Because deep down, they want to win. Putting up another Ned Lamont writ large isn't going to get them anywhere, and Mrs. Clinton will be a heckuva lot more palatable than Fred Thompson or Mitt Romney.
Anyway, why do I bring up C[r]AP? Because it was that self-same Clintonoid cabal that produced the big-splash "report," entitled The Right Wing Domination Of Talk Radio And How To End It, that, despite the evocative handle, is intended as a legitimate public policy proposal seeking to "restore objectivity and balance to the public airwaves". Translated from the original Clintonoid BS, it means "muzzle the center-right by shutting down the only sector of the media in which conservatives are allowed to compete, and in which we can't".
Mark Levin says it well:
Groups like this claim to speak for the public and wrap themselves in fairness and equality. But their purpose is to intimidate radio executives. The fact is that the Clintons and the Democrat Party created Air America. It is a failure. The public has tuned it out and it doesn't get ratings. And before Air America, the public rejected such short-lived liberal hosts as Mario Cuomo and Jesse Jackson....
In the name of speech and competition, the report calls for severe government regulation of talk radio.
And just in time for the 2008 presidential election, too.
Yeah, THAT's a coincidence.
At least as much as this was:
Senator James Inhofe told talk-radio host John Ziegler that Barbara Boxer and Hillary Clinton want to introduce legislation aiming to control talk radio. This sounds like the story he told on CQ Radio yesterday, describing a conversation he overheard in an elevator about two "very liberal" Senators complaining about the effect talk radio has in organizing oppositon to their policies. The Senator wouldn't name the names at the time, but Ziegler got him to cough them up later.
Whether that bipartisan threesome transpired "the other day" or three years ago, it provides additional, and redundant, context for the C[r]AP anti-talk radio report.
It is, indeed, another Clintonoid conspiracy, folks. But like all Clintonoid conspiracies, this one is taking place right out in the open, in plain sight, for any who have the courage and testicular fortitude to see it for what it is. And in fifteen years on the national stage, not once have Bill & Hill ever been called on a single one of them - at least none that didn't involve pecker tracks.
Hillary is America's answer to Hugo Chavez. One can only imagine the reign of terror that will commence after she's sworn in nineteen months from two days ago.
But at least the days of Clintonoid conspiracies will come to an end.
<<< Home