Poison Pelosi
Just when I think the Democrats can sink no lower, down they go a little further. These comments by Nancy Pelosi regarding Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq are completely outrageous and uncalled for.
"The President knows that because the troops are in harm's way that we won't cut off the resources," Pelosi, head of the Democratic-led House, told ABC's Good Morning America. "That's why he's moving so quickly to put them in harm's way."
Get that? Pelosi is accusing Bush of putting soldiers into dangerous situations in order to stymie the Democrats. No, Nancy, politicizing the war is YOUR area of expertise. Bush wants to win the War on Terror, which is of course one of the reasons for your bitter, psychotic hatred of him.
Pelosi, a California liberal who earlier this month became the first woman to lead the House, insisted on Friday that Democrats would never deny funding to U.S. forces in wartime.
"But we will hold the President accountable," she said. "He has to answer for his war. He has dug a hole so deep he can't even see the light on this ... It's a historic blunder."
I dunno, Nancy, maybe you better practice on holding some of the slugs in your own party accountable before you mess with Bush. Bush has never blamed anyone else for anything that has happened in this war, and he sure never gets credit from the likes of you for the things that go right.
The fact that people like this heifer are in power just makes me sick.
JASmius adds: Crazy Nancy is just trying to cover her ass with the kook fringe Donk base for not having already defunded the war - particularly with the President redoubling efforts to try and pacify Iraq in the teeth of the '06 election results. Something one might wish he had attempted before the collective public memory of 9/11 had completely faded.
Of course, I personally question whether Bush wants to win the WAIF given his failure to liberate either Iran or Syria over the past three years while the window of opportunity was open to do so. The war cannot be won (and Iraq stablized) until these regimes are destroyed and their people set free.
What we're looking at with the President and the Speakertrix are two bitterly opposed but half-hearted foes who are both burying themselves with their respective political bases. Yet it is still far more likely - indeed, inevitable - that the Democrats will defund the war than that Bush will do what is necessary to win it.
November 7th, 2006 made defeat inevitable. It's just a question of how soon it comes, and how many of us perish.
"The President knows that because the troops are in harm's way that we won't cut off the resources," Pelosi, head of the Democratic-led House, told ABC's Good Morning America. "That's why he's moving so quickly to put them in harm's way."
Get that? Pelosi is accusing Bush of putting soldiers into dangerous situations in order to stymie the Democrats. No, Nancy, politicizing the war is YOUR area of expertise. Bush wants to win the War on Terror, which is of course one of the reasons for your bitter, psychotic hatred of him.
Pelosi, a California liberal who earlier this month became the first woman to lead the House, insisted on Friday that Democrats would never deny funding to U.S. forces in wartime.
"But we will hold the President accountable," she said. "He has to answer for his war. He has dug a hole so deep he can't even see the light on this ... It's a historic blunder."
I dunno, Nancy, maybe you better practice on holding some of the slugs in your own party accountable before you mess with Bush. Bush has never blamed anyone else for anything that has happened in this war, and he sure never gets credit from the likes of you for the things that go right.
The fact that people like this heifer are in power just makes me sick.
JASmius adds: Crazy Nancy is just trying to cover her ass with the kook fringe Donk base for not having already defunded the war - particularly with the President redoubling efforts to try and pacify Iraq in the teeth of the '06 election results. Something one might wish he had attempted before the collective public memory of 9/11 had completely faded.
Of course, I personally question whether Bush wants to win the WAIF given his failure to liberate either Iran or Syria over the past three years while the window of opportunity was open to do so. The war cannot be won (and Iraq stablized) until these regimes are destroyed and their people set free.
What we're looking at with the President and the Speakertrix are two bitterly opposed but half-hearted foes who are both burying themselves with their respective political bases. Yet it is still far more likely - indeed, inevitable - that the Democrats will defund the war than that Bush will do what is necessary to win it.
November 7th, 2006 made defeat inevitable. It's just a question of how soon it comes, and how many of us perish.
<<< Home